首页

道法古今第36期:近代早期的书籍与规范性知识:一个物质法律史的视角
时间 : 2021-11-29       作者:教科办       阅读数:
主讲老师 Manuela Bragagnolo from University of Trento/Max Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal Theory 时间 2021年11月30日19:00-21:00
地点 Zoom 线上会议 会议号:912 0775 8223 密码:286415 11
30

【道法古今论坛第36期】

Books and Normative Knowledge in the Early Modern Period A Contribution to Material Legal History

近代早期的书籍与规范性知识:一个物质法律史的视角

主讲人:Manuela Bragagnolo

University of Trento/Max Planck Institute for Legal History and Legal Theory

与谈人:

郭琛

中国政法大学美高梅mgm1888-官方网站-App Store

郭逸豪

中国政法大学美高梅mgm1888-官方网站-App Store

赵博阳

上海社科院宗教研究所

主持人:

李富鹏

中国政法大学美高梅mgm1888-官方网站-App Store

讲座简介:

How was normative knowledge produced in the early modern period? One obvious way to answer this question is to study the contents of legal books. This would mean to identify normative knowledge with legal thinking, namely with the intellectual output of the “so-called” author.

But we can also look at these books as material objects, and combine methods and questions from book history and legal history. This second approach that we can call “material legal history”, invites us to consider that knowledge was also the result of material and social processes of production. Early modern legal “authors”, amongst many others actors, were actively involved in these processes, thus contributing to the production of knowledge with more than just their thoughts.

My talk takes this second approach and looks at a specific kind of normative book, «pragmatic» books. Mobilising the knowledge that was needed to produce normative statements, pragmatic books were widespread in the West in the early modern period and circulated largely in the frontier regions of the Early Modern Empires.

Concerning pragmatic normative books, I will explore the notion of early modern legal authorship, which was very much related to authority and included a wider range of activities than just writing a book. I will show how, in the case of pragmatic normative books, this could actively be constructed by “authors”. I will therefore focus on the agency of early modern legal authors in the editorial system as an important component of the production of normative knowledge.

Suggested Readings:

Duve, Thomas, Otto Danwerth (eds.) (2020), Knowledge of the pragmatici: Legal and Moral Theological Literature and the Formation of Early Modern Ibero-America, Leiden

https://brill.com/view/title/56781

Duve, Thomas et al. (eds.) (2021), The School of Salamanca: A Case of Global Knowledge Production, Leiden

https://brill.com/view/title/59717

HESPANHA, ANTÓNIO MANUEL (2008), Form and content in early modern legal books. Bridging the gap between material bibliography and the history of legal thought, in: Rechtsgeschichte – Legal History 12, 12-50

http://rg.rg.mpg.de/en/article_id/579

会议时间:20211130日(周二)19:0021:00(北京时间)

会议软件:Zoom会议

会议链接:http://zoom.us/j/91207758223

会议号:912 0775 8223(密码:286415 可通过扫描下方二维码参与)

讲座语言:英语

 

版权所有:中国政法大学美高梅mgm1888-官方网站-App Store|学校邮箱:cupl@cupl.edu.cn | 网站备案 /许可证号:京ICP备05004635号-1 | 京公网安备:110402430029 | 建设维护 : 网络安全和信息化办公室